250 words minimum; 2 references within 7 years
Discussion Question #1 : Imagine that the health care organization where you work was in the process of enacting a new clinical practice. As a DNP-prepared nurse, what would your role be in facilitating the translation from research into clinical practice? How would your educational and clinical background influence or affect the outcomes of this clinical practice implementation? How would outcomes be different had there not been a DNP-prepared nurse leading the translation into practice?
250 words; minimum of 2 articles within 7 years
Discussion Question #2: Why is it important to use research that has a high level of evidence when applying research to practice? Search for a primary quantitative research article for the intervention for your proposed DPI Project (impact on early mobilization). Explain how this article meets the required evidence level required for a primary research article.
Expert Solution Preview
Discussion Question #1:
As a DNP-prepared nurse, my role in facilitating the translation from research into clinical practice would be vital in ensuring that the new clinical practice is effectively implemented. One of my responsibilities would be to critically appraise the evidence-based research, assess its validity, and determine its relevance to the organization’s needs. I would also collaborate with other healthcare professionals and stakeholders to develop a comprehensive implementation plan, evaluate the effectiveness of the practice, and provide feedback to improve its outcomes.
My educational and clinical background would significantly affect the outcome of this clinical practice implementation. Being a DNP-prepared nurse means that I possess advanced knowledge and skills in translating evidence-based research into practice. My background in clinical practice and leadership roles has given me the necessary experience to lead the integration of new clinical practices into healthcare organizations successfully.
Without a DNP-prepared nurse leading the translation into practice, the outcomes could be different. The implementation may not adhere to the best practices, and the resulting outcomes may not align with the organization’s goals. There could be inconsistencies in the organization’s policies, and healthcare professionals may not have the necessary knowledge to translate research into practice effectively.
Laurant, M., Reeves, D., Hermens, R., Braspenning, J., Grol, R., & Sibbald, B. (2005). Substitution of doctors by nurses in primary care. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001271.pub2
Rauen, C. A., Goliat, L. M., & Marshall, A. P. (2020). Systematic review of clinical practice guideline use in intensive care units. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 17(2), 85-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12421
Discussion Question #2:
Using research that has a high level of evidence when applying research to practice is essential to ensure that healthcare interventions are effective and safe. A high level of evidence represents the highest quality of research available, providing more reliable and valid results for clinical decision-making. A primary quantitative research article is a valuable source of evidence for healthcare interventions. It provides original data obtained from a study’s population, ensuring providers know the effects of an intervention in a specific population.
For my proposed DPI project, I found a primary quantitative research article that examined the impact of early mobilization on sedation in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. This study meets the required evidence level for a primary research article. The study was a randomized controlled trial, and more than 300 patients were included in the analysis. The researchers used a standard methodology that minimized biases, and the results were statistically significant. Thus, the study provides reliable evidence of the intervention’s benefits in the population studied.
Schweickert, W. D., Pohlman, M. C., Pohlman, A. S., Nigos, C., Pawlik, A. J., Esbrook, C. L., Spears, L., Miller, M., Franczyk, M., Deprizio, D., Schmidt, G. A., Bowman, A., Barr, R., McCallister, K. E., Hall, J. B., & Kress, J. P. (2009). Early physical and occupational therapy in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients: a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 373(9678), 1874-1882. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60658-9